Cases 31 - 40 of 93
Patrino v. Benitez et al
as 5:2019cv00664
Defendant:
Douglas Michael Littleton, Francisco I. Benitez, Frank Benitez and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrino
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Perform Investment Limited v. Trinidad et al
as 2:2019cv01006
Plaintiff:
Perform Investment Limited
Defendant:
Francisco Trinidad, Big Charritos, LLC and Felipe Nativdad Martinez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
City and County of San Francisco et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45022
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Purdue Pharma L.P., Kathe Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2018cv02266
Petitioner:
Francisco Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez v. Garcia
as 3:2018cv01685
Defendant:
Carlos A. Garcia
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sergio Francisco Pueblo Palomo v. DeMaio et al
as 5:2018mc00008
Plaintiff:
Sergio Francisco Pueblo Palomo
Defendant:
Joseph G. DeMaio , Circle Song Music, LLC , God of Thunder Productions, LTD and others
Interested_party:
Mary Ellen Breon
Sergio Francisco Pueblo Palomo v. DeMaio et al
as 5:2018mc00004
Plaintiff:
Sergio Francisco Pueblo Palomo
Defendant:
Joseph G. DeMaio , Circle Song Music, LLC , God of Thunder Productions, LTD and others
Interested_party:
Patricia Breon
Diaz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv01602
Plaintiff:
Francisco T. Diaz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Hampton v. Quintana et al
as 1:2017cv00369
Petitioner:
Ronald Hampton, Jr.
Respondent:
Francisco Quintana, Joseph Deter, Clay L. Tharp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00322
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
