Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11853
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11749
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11699
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicu: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. ยง 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11609
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11413
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Tang v. Plymouth County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2008cv11380
Plaintiff: Toan Tang
Defendant: Plymouth County Correctional Facility, Joseph D. McDonald and Brian H. Gillen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tang v. Keefe Commissary Network et al
as 1:2008cv11378
Plaintiff: Toan Tang
Defendant: Keefe Commissary Network, Plymouth County Correctional Facility, Joe McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tang v. Plymouth County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2008cv11292
Plaintiff: Toan Tang
Defendant: Plymouth County Correctional Facility, Joseph D. McDonald and Brian H. Gillen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PNC Bank, National Association v. Mad Turk Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv11144
Plaintiff: PNC Bank, National Association
Defendant: Mad Turk Enterprises, Inc., Cheryl L. Gillen and Neil R. Gillen
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
Tang v. Kumm et al
as 1:2008cv11062
Plaintiff: Toan Tang
Defendant: R. Kumm, Creihan, N. Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?