Cases 31 - 40 of 151
Garry Y. Itkin v. Golden Sphinx Limited, et al
as 2:2021cv04907
Plaintiff:
Garry Y. Itkin
Defendant:
Golden Sphinx Limited and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Anderson v. Coherent, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv04505
Plaintiff:
Jerome Anderson
Defendant:
Beverly Kay Matthews, Andreas W. Mattes, Coherent, Inc. and others
Finger v. Coherent, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv04217
Defendant:
Andreas W Mattes, Beverly Kay Matthews, Michael R McMullen and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Finger
Lawrence v. Coherent, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv04193
Defendant:
ANDREAS W MATTES, BEVERLY KAY MATTHEWS, MICHAEL R MCMULLEN and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Thomas v. Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv02477
Defendant:
Peder K. Jensen, Thomas Civik, Carol Schafer and others
Plaintiff:
Satheesh Thomas
Wheeler v. Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv02097
Defendant:
Peder K. Jensen, Thomas Civik, Carol Schafer and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wheeler
Dyson v. Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01988
Defendant:
Peder K. Jensen, Thomas Civik, Carol Schafer and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dyson
Hernandez et al v. Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
as 4:2021cv01782
Plaintiff:
Michael Caldwell, Phyllis Accornero, Paul Naepflin and others
Defendant:
Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Commerce Home Mortgage LLC v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
as 3:2021cv01678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff's Att Vincent Loh, Commerce Home Mortgage LLC, Attorney Timothy J Garry and others
Defendant:
John M. Landry, Attorney Polly Towill, madalyn macarr and others
Intervenor:
Federal Housing Finance Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(HC) Mason v. Pickett
as 2:2020at01079
Respondent:
Jason Pickett and People of the State of California
Petitioner:
Garry Dewayne Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
