Cases 31 - 40 of 84
Rameses Lomingkit, et al v. Apollo Education Group, Inc., et al
as 17-16634
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAMESES TE LOMINGKIT, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND and GOVERNMENT OF GUAM RETIREMENT FUND
Defendant - Appellee:
APOLLO EDUCATION GROUP, INC., PETER V. SPERLING, GREGORY W. CAPPELLI and others
Lau v. Fernandez et al
as 1:2017cv00083
Plaintiff:
Gabriel H.T. Lau
Defendant:
Jon Fernandez, Antonette Santos and Guam Department of Education for the Government of Guam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Government of Guam, et al
as 17-15229
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF GUAM
Defendant - Appellant:
MORRICO EQUIPMENT LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Dela Cruz v. D.O.A. Payroll for Government of Guam Employees
as 1:2016cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jaydeen Catherine Dela Cruz
Defendant:
D.O.A. Payroll for Government of Guam Employees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dela Cruz v. D.O.A. Payroll for Government of Guam Employees
as 1:2016cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jaydeen Catherine Dela Cruz
Defendant:
D.O.A. Payroll for Government of Guam Employees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dela Cruz v. D.O.A. Payroll for Government of Guam Employees
as 1:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jaydeen Catherine Dela Cruz
Defendant:
D.O.A. Payroll for Government of Guam Employees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
