Cases 31 - 40 of 82
Hardy et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23914
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hardy and Joe Hardy
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardy-Compton et al. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al.
as 2:2014cv23332
Plaintiff:
Lorain Hardy-Compton and David Compton
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23082
Plaintiff:
Betty C. Phillips and Shepperd Hardy Phillips, Jr.
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardy v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23015
Plaintiff:
Janice Ramsey Hardy
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardie v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv22164
Plaintiff:
Shirley Hardie
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Page et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv19726
Plaintiff:
Heather Nicole Page and Jamie Hardy Page
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardy v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv18783
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Hardy
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardy v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv15024
Plaintiff:
Tracy Hardy
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodard-Hardie et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv10365
Plaintiff:
Susan Woodard-Hardie and David Hardie
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardy v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07122
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Hardy
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
