Cases 31 - 40 of 394
Hayes v. Target Corporation
as 1:2022cv00560
Plaintiff:
Brenda Hayes
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Haymond v. Bey et al
as 1:2022cv00566
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Haymond
Defendant:
Tia Bey, Jeremy Trimble, Penny Liles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Global Advantech Resources Limited
as 4:2022cv03968
Plaintiff:
Global Advantech Resources Limited
Defendant:
Dale Hayes, Harlan Chappelle, James Hackett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mundine v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00930
Petitioner:
Jeremy Hayes Mundine
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mundine v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00929
Petitioner:
Jeremy Hayes Mundine
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. Dallas County Jail
as 3:2022cv02024
Petitioner:
Rosablanca Monique Hayes
Respondent:
Dallas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes et al v. Locke Supply Co. et al
as 4:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
Brynna Hayes and Adrian Rominu
Defendant:
Locke Supply Co. and Renwick Matthew Pierre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Hayes v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
as 4:2022cv03717
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hayes
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Sierra et al v. Dallas County Jail
as 5:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Solema Sierra, Nena Zuley, Terria Burks and others
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zuniga v. Ms. Mitchell et al
as 3:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Julio A Zuniga
Defendant:
Ms. Mitchell, Bridgette Hayes, Willie Ratliff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
