Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Tamori-Holmes v. Plumas County et al
as 2:2012at01047
Plaintiff:
Robin Gail Tamori-Holmes
Defendant:
Plumas County , Country Villa Merced Behavioral Health Center , CAL OSHA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Sanders v. Dept of Health & Human Services
as 3:2012cv00509
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Sanders
Defendant:
Dept of Health & Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McLean v. Sebelius, et al.
as 2:2011cv03039
Plaintiff:
Danika McLean
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius and Department of Health & Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
-SH Greisse v. SHHS
as 2:1993cv07413
Plaintiff:
Fathy Greisse
Defendant:
Secretary of Health & Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marco Garcia v. U.S. Secretary of Health & Human Services et al
as 2:2010cv08820
Defendant:
Does, Roxanne Khadem, Dimisio Montenegro and others
Plaintiff:
Marco Garcia
Nicholas v. Brown et al
as 3:2010cv04093
Plaintiff:
Karl B. Nicholas
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Christine Earnshaw, Sylvia Shapiro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Community Convalescent Center Montclair, Inc. v. Department of Health & Human Services Centers et al
as 2:2010cv06263
Plaintiff:
Community Convalescent Center Montclair, Inc.
Defendant:
Department of Health & Human Services Centers, Department of Veterans Affairs and Does
Alvarado v. Sebelius et al
as 2:2010at01117
Plaintiff:
Jose Alvarado
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Anderson v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2010cv00705
Plaintiff:
Percy Anderson, Sr.
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Health & Human Service Agency, Shelly Paule and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv03183
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
