Cases 31 - 40 of 273
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hardy et al v. City of Chicago Heights et al
as 1:2021cv06689
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Hardy and Tiffany Hardy
Defendant:
City of Chicago Heights, Ryan Fenimore, Officer Frausto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talon Wall Holdings, LLC et al v. Reflection Window & Wall, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv06618
Plaintiff:
Talon Wall Holdings, LLC, Entekk Group LTD. and Chicago Heights Glass, Inc.
Defendant:
Reflection Window & Wall, LLC, Joel J. Phelps, Pepper Construction Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lewis v. IDOC et al
as 3:2021cv01427
Plaintiff:
Darrion I. Lewis
Defendant:
IDOC, Fairview Heights Police Department, Chief of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv50407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
McNeil v. The City of Chicago Heights et al
as 1:2021cv04996
Plaintiff:
Henry McNeil
Defendant:
The City of Chicago Heights and Ryan Meder (#158)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Arlington Heights Police et al
as 1:2021cv04648
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Johnson
Defendant:
Arlington Heights Police and Department Det Patrick Chojnowski #319
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anchondo v. Chicago Heights Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv04649
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Anchondo
Defendant:
Chicago Heights Police Department and Melissa Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Anchondo v. Hill et al
as 1:2021cv04014
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Anchondo
Defendant:
Melissa Hill and Chicago Heights Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
