Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Zand v. DigitalGlobe, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01570
Plaintiff:
Stuart Zand
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc. , Howell M. Estes, III , Nick S. Cyprus and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Gussin v. DigitalGlobe, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv01190
Plaintiff:
Dane Gussin
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc , Howell M. Estes, Nick S. Cyprus and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bussey v. DigitalGlobe, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01159
Plaintiff:
Royce Bussey
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc., Howell M. Estes, III, Nick S. Cyprus and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10
Jeweltex Manufacturing Inc. Retirement Plan v. DigitalGlobe, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01140
Plaintiff:
Jeweltex Manufacturing Inc. Retirement Plan
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc., Jeffrey R. Tarr, Howell M. Estes, III and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Assad v. DigitalGlobe, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv01097
Plaintiff:
George Assad
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc , Howell M. Estes, III , Nick S. Cyprus and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Corning v. Correctional Corporation of America et al
as 1:2015cv01878
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Corning
Defendant:
Correctional Corporation of America, David Gross, S. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 1:2015cv01141
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson et al v. Western Electricity Coordinating Council
as 1:2015cv00811
Plaintiff:
Steven Thompson , Fred Krumpeck , Jack Hardgrave and others
Defendant:
Western Electricity Coordinating Council
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Bramscher v. Qucik et al
as 1:2015cv00257
Plaintiff:
William Robert Bramscher
Defendant:
Don (I) Quick, Don Quick, Daniel (I) Thomas Brechbuhl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00541
Plaintiff:
Sharon Howell
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
