Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Faircloth v. Hartman et al
as 1:2008cv01742
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Faircloth
Defendant:
Hartman, Elaine Meyers and Pitcher
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Gillette v. Broomfield Police Department et al
as 1:2007cv02397
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt W. Gillette, II
Defendant:
Broomfield Police Department, Maddox, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
American Automobile Insurance Company v. Marlow et al
as 1:2007cv02180
Plaintiff:
American Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dennis Marlow, William C. Doukas, Cynthia L. Doukas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hartman v. USA
as 1:2007cv01921
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Leroy Hartman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Prymak et al v. Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01181
Plaintiff:
John Prymak, Lillian Prymak, Preston Smith and others
Defendant:
Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc. and Mutual Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Powers v. Hartman et al
as 1:2007cv01012
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Powers
Defendant:
Hartman, Broomfield Detention Center and Broomfield, City and County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
