Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Godwin v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2012cv04053
Plaintiff:
Cynthia W. Godwin
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem Inc, Premera Blue Cross of Alaska and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Teichman et al v. Empire Plan/United Health Care Service, Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv06039
Defendant:
Empire Plan/United Health Care Service, Corp. and Managed Physical Network, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Camille Teichman and Michelle Teichman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
DAVIDSON v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF ALABAMA et al
as 5:2012cv00370
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER RAY DAVIDSON
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF ALABAMA, BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA, BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Conway v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2012cv02532
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Conway
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama , Anthem Inc, Premera Blue Cross of Alaska and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Swenson v. Maine Township High School District 207 et al
as 1:2011cv00867
Plaintiff:
Janie L. Swenson
Defendant:
Maine Township High School District 207 and Health Care Service Corp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Nefeldt
as 1:2009cv05268
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Nefeldt
Defendant:
Health Care Services Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Butler Manufacturing Company, et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texa, et al
as 07-1816
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Butler Manufacturing Company
Plaintiff:
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
Defendant - Appellee:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, a Division of Health Care Service Corp.
Defendant:
Gerber Life Insurance Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
