Cases 31 - 40 of 101
Herring v. The State of Georgia
as 1:2022cv02271
Petitioner:
Cedric Herring
Respondent:
The State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HERRING v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
JAMES HERRING
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER CHARLIE WARD, WARDEN BERRY, WARDEN PERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. HERRING et al
as 5:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JAMES KING
Defendant:
WADE W HERRING, III and ALISON L CURRIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herring v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv01549
Plaintiff:
Constance Herring
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company and Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Sompo International Insurance v. Bain Berkeley, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01309
Plaintiff:
Sompo International Insurance and Endurance American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Bain Berkeley, Inc., Katherine Stubbs, Angela Syverson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Go Get Her Properties v. Clay
as 1:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Go Get Her Properties
Defendant:
Raymond Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Thompson v. The Board of Pardons and Parole State of Georgia et al
as 6:2021cv00084
Plaintiff:
Tony Thompson
Defendant:
The Board of Pardons and Parole State of Georgia, Terry Barnard, Brian Owns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MOORE v. BARNARD et al
as 5:2021cv00225
Plaintiff:
JAIRUS BERNARD MOORE
Defendant:
BRIAN QWENS, BOARD, CHAIRMAN TERRY E BARNARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
