Cases 31 - 40 of 394
Yi v. Attorney General et al
as 2:2021cv00573
Petitioner:
Li Peng Yi
Respondent:
U.S. ICE Field Office Director for The Field Office and Warden of Immigration Detention Facility, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00830
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00760
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00748
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00681
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00674
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Francisco Munoz Ortiz v. William Barr, et al
as 21-35384
Respondent:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Acting Director of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN LANGFORD, Warden, Tacoma Northwest Detention Center, NATHALIE ASHER, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Field Office Director (Tacoma ICE) and others
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO MUNOZ ORTIZ
Dunbar v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2021cv21825
Defendant:
ICE Field Office Director for the Miami Field Office, Warden of Immigration Facility, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Oliver J. Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00027
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00389
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
