Cases 31 - 37 of 37
NELSEN v. ASBESTOS CORP LTD INC et al
as 2:2009cv64424
Plaintiff:
MARGUERITE D NELSEN
Defendant:
ASBESTOS CORP LTD INC, CELOTEX CORPORATION, PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MATTSON et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv64343
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE W MATTSON and EDRA P MATTSON
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION, PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LIEBL v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2009cv64346
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M LIEBL
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES INC, RUBEROID CO, H K PORTER CO and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LERILLE et al v. MONSANTO CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv74194
Plaintiff:
BETTY E. LERILLE, BETTY E. LERILLE, BETTY E. LERILLE and others
Defendant:
MONSANTO CORPORATION, NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION, NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
M&M STONE CO. v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al
as 2:2007cv04784
Plaintiff:
M&M STONE CO.
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, ROGER J. HORNBERGER, J. SCOTT ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ATWELL et al v. A. C. & S., INC. et al
as 2:2007cv64528
Plaintiff:
PAUL ATWELL, EMILIE ATWELL, ROBERT JUSTINSON and others
Defendant:
A. C. & S., INC., AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BAILEY et al v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62903
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL E BAILEY, VIRGIL E BAILEY, VIRGIL E BAILEY and others
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
