Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Shadle v. Village of Johnsburg et al
as 3:2007cv50101
Plaintiff:
Andrew Shadle, Andrew Shadle and Andrew Shadle
Defendant:
Village of Johnsburg, Todd Colander and Unknon Police Officers John Does and Jane Roes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kinsey v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2007cv02471
Plaintiff:
Calvin Kinsey and Calvin Kinsey
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ramon Calixto, Charlene Lyles-Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Moore v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2007cv02351
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Moore and Lorenzo Moore
Defendant:
City of Chicago and John Does and Jane Roes 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brooks v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2007cv02346
Plaintiff:
Dewan Brooks and Dewan Brooks
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Michael Carroll, James Obaldo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Blakey v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2007cv01880
Plaintiff:
Ian Blakey, Ian Blakey and Ian Blakey
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Philip Cline, Keith Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hartman v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2007cv01351
Plaintiff:
Richard Hartman, Richard Hartman and Richard Hartman
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Carmen Lopez, Rogelio Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Martin et al v. City of Chicago, The et al
as 1:2007cv00828
Plaintiff:
Daquel Martin, Daquel Martin, Davontae Martin and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, The, Brian Sherman, Jason Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DINOIA v. SEVERAL UNNAMED AGENTS OF THE FEDERAL STATE GOVERNMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2007cv00326
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. DINOIA
Defendant:
SEVERAL UNNAMED AGENTS OF THE FEDERAL STATE GOVERNMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN DOES OR JANE ROES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
