Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Bond v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2023cv03073
Plaintiff:
Alvin Bond
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2023cv03078
Plaintiff:
Chester McCoy
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2023cv03081
Plaintiff:
Javon Allen
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Jacksonville Correctional Center et al
as 3:2023cv03061
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Jacksonville Correctional Center and Cherryle Hinthorne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staten Taylor v. Cherryle Hinthorne, et al
as 23-1349
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATEN TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERRYLE HINTHORNE, Warden, HAROLETTA GIVENS, M. THOMPSON and others
Staten Taylor v. Cherryle Hinthorne, et al
as 23-1211
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATEN TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERRYLE HINTHORNE, Warden, HAROLETTA GIVENS, M. THOMPSON and others
Rusk v. Jacksonville Correctional Center
as 3:2022cv03277
Petitioner:
Nicholas L Rusk
Respondent:
Jacksonville Correctional Center
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pruett v. Jacksonville Correctional Center
as 3:2019cv03165
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Pruett
Defendant:
Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juvinall v. Jacksonville Correctional Center
as 3:2013cv03071
Plaintiff:
Ricky Juvinall, Jr
Defendant:
Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
