Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Ricky Benson v. Mark Luttrell, Jr., et al
as 12-5418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON, aka Rickey Benson
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., JAMES E. COLEMAN and ROBERT MOORE
Benson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2012cv02300
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shelby County Government, Mark H. Luttrell, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Shelby Co. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv02117
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cole
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Dept. of Corrections, Correct Care Solutions, Randolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. S.C.D.C. et al
as 2:2011cv03084
Plaintiff:
Dana Walker
Defendant:
S.C.D.C., James E. Coleman, Dennis Tillman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parson v. Shelby Co. Dept. of Corr. et al
as 2:2011cv02817
Plaintiff:
Donny Parson
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Dept. of Corr., Karen Mitchell, Tonya J. Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Higglebottom et al
as 2:2011cv02729
Plaintiff:
Toscar Smith
Defendant:
Higglebottom, James E. Coleman, Patricia Echols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coy McKaughan v. Mark Luttrell, Jr., et al
as 11-5783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COY MCKAUGHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., Shelby County Sheriff, JAMES E. COLEMAN, Chief Jailer, R. MOORE and others
COLEMAN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABIILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31416
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. COLEMAN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABIILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
McKaughan v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2010cv02798
Plaintiff:
Coy McKaughan
Defendant:
Mark H. Luttrell, Jr, James E. Coleman, R. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2010cv02686
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Mark Luttrell, Jr., James E. Coleman, Robert Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
