Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Empire State Carpenters Welfare, Pension and Annuity Funds et al v. Long Island Wholesalers Nassau-Suffolk Incorporated
as 2:2009cv04457
Plaintiff:
Empire State Carpenters Welfare, Pension and Annuity Funds, Empire State Carpenters Welfare, Pension and Annuity Funds, Empire State Carpenters Welfare, Pension and Annuity Funds and others
Defendant:
Long Island Wholesalers Nassau-Suffolk Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Empire State Carpenters Welfare, Pension, and Apprenticeship Training Funds et al v. Island Pump & Tank Corporation
as 2:2009cv04458
Plaintiff:
Empire State Carpenters Welfare, Pension, and Apprenticeship Training Funds, Empire State Carpenters Welfare, Pension, and Apprenticeship Training Funds, Empire State Carpenters Welfare, Pension, and Apprenticeship Training Funds and others
Defendant:
Island Pump & Tank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Ernestine Young, et al v. City and County of Honolulu
as 09-16034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNESTINE CHING YOUNG, individually, ERNESTINE C. YOUNG, Trustee of the Wallace L. Young Trust dated April 12, 2005 (Residuary Trust), JAMES M. SHERMAN, AKA James Malcolm Sherman and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU
DAVIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2009cv01892
Plaintiff:
JAMES MALCOLM DAVIS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, MIDDLESEX COUNTY, TOWNSHIP OF PERTH AMBOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Malcolm Alexander v. A.m. Lockett & Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-76869
Plaintiff:
James Malcolm Alexander
Defendant:
A.m. Lockett & Co
ALEXANDER v. A.M. LOCKETT & CO., ET AL.
as 2:2008cv76869
Plaintiff:
JAMES MALCOLM ALEXANDER and JAMES MALCOLM ALEXANDER
Defendant:
A.M. LOCKETT & COMPANY, LTD., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ALLIED EQUIPMENT, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
