Cases 31 - 40 of 67
MINNICH v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2014cv07236
Plaintiff:
PAMELA MINNICH
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. , CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. PLACE et al
as 2:2014cv06150
Plaintiff:
ASIA GREEN
Defendant:
KYLE PLACE , BRAD DOBRY , JOHN/JANE DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPKINS v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2014cv05557
Plaintiff:
ALFRED THOMPKINS
Defendant:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, ALMOND, ELDRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KORP v. LAMANDRE et al
as 2:2014cv04147
Plaintiff:
BARBARA KORP
Defendant:
DAKOTA LAMANDRE, KIM F. LAMANDRE and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REYES v. BOUDRIA et al
as 2:2014cv00673
Plaintiff:
SIMONE REYES
Defendant:
JACQUELIN BOUDRIA, LAWRENCE BOUDRIA, ABC, INC. (1-5) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hatton v. Lake Region Urgent Care, P.C. et al
as 3:2013cv03004
Plaintiff:
Natalya Levin Hatton
Defendant:
Lake Region Urgent Care, P.C. and John and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FENKELL v. DRAUCKER et al
as 2:2013cv04272
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. FENKELL
Defendant:
CARL A. DRAUCKER, SQUIRE SANDERS US LLP and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
SAUER et al v. PATEL et al
as 2:2013cv01949
Plaintiff:
TARA SAUER and JOHN SAUER
Defendant:
KISHAN PATEL , HASMUKHBHAI PATEL and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Borrelli et al v. Reilly Township et al
as 3:2013cv00735
Plaintiff:
Charles Borrelli, Kimberly Borrelli, C.B. and others
Defendant:
Reilly Township, Joe Wenner, John Zuratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOCHIN v. WALL et al
as 2:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
DIANE R. GOCHIN
Defendant:
KELLY C. WALL, ARTHUR TILSON, MINDY HARRIS, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
