Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Anthony Dale Farley v. V. Raso et al
as 2:2013cv02211
Defendant:
Darrin Bright, G. Ellis, Lim Javate and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dale Farley
Rodriguez v. Javate
as 3:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Juan Rodriguez
Defendant:
Rosana Lim Javate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Bright et al
as 4:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Jackson
Defendant:
D. Bright, R. Delgado, L. Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Javate
as 1:2012cv02057
Plaintiff:
Juan Rodriguez
Defendant:
Rosana Lim Javate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Bright et al
as 4:2012cv06020
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Jackson
Defendant:
D. Bright, R. Delgado, L. Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Javate, MD et al
as 3:2012cv05614
Plaintiff:
James Brian Hamilton
Defendant:
Rosana Lim Javate, MD, L Hedden, R. Delgado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Javate et al
as 3:2012cv04279
Plaintiff:
James Brian Hamilton
Defendant:
Javate, Hedden, Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Javate et al v. Universal American Mortgage Company, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00525
Defendant:
Richard Michael Bowes, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., National Default Servicing Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Javate and Maria Solorzano-Javate
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Javate et al v. Nevada Federal Credit Union et al
as 2:2012cv00366
Defendant:
Bear Stearns & Co., Inc., Blaylock & Partners, LP, Capital Research and Management Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Javate and Maria Guadalupe Solorzano-Javate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Grogan v. Javate et al
as 3:2011cv06305
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Grogan
Defendant:
Javate, Jan Pierre, Sangha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
