Cases 31 - 40 of 887
Larkin v. Martinez et al
as 3:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E Larkin
Defendant:
Martinez and Jeff Segal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANDERSON et al v. COFFMAN
as 1:2023cv01249
Plaintiff:
Debra Anderson and Jeffrey Anderson
Defendant:
Julie Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Penner v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Penner
Defendant:
Galipeau, Talbot, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penner v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Penner
Defendant:
Galipeau, Zambrana, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Continental Western Insurance Company et al v. Hilton-Spencerport Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Continental Western Insurance Company and Acadia Insurance Company
Defendant:
Hilton-Spencerport Express, Inc., Chasen Thompson, Thomas Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Larkin v. Segal et al
as 3:2023cv00626
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E Larkin
Defendant:
Jeff Segal, Medical Staff's and Personal Property Ofc's
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larkin v. Sheriff
as 3:2023cv00627
Petitioner:
Jeffrey E Larkin
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larkin v. Segal et al
as 3:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E Larkin
Defendant:
Jeff Segal and Oblinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larkin v. Segal et al
as 3:2023cv00624
Defendant:
Leiman, Jeff Segal, Lt. Lemian and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E Larkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Threadgill et al v. Keystone RV Company
as 3:2023cv00583
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey P. Threadgill and Jessica Threadgill
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
