Cases 31 - 40 of 107
Bretz v. Owens et al
as 1:2016cv02166
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bretz
Defendant:
Bill Owens and John Hickenlooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hentges v. Walter
as 1:2016cv01891
Plaintiff:
John M. Hentges
Defendant:
Carol A. Walter, John C. Hugger, Chris Voisinet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2016cv01725
Plaintiff:
Torrey Banks
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Kurt Pierpoint, Ed Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hentges v. Walter et al
as 1:2016cv01480
Plaintiff:
John M. Hentges
Defendant:
Carol A. Walter, Jamin M. Alabiso, Jamin (I) M. Alabiso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Himes v. Colorado Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv01315
Plaintiff:
Eddie Himes
Defendant:
Colorado Dept. of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Roger Werholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lujan v. Colorado Dept. Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv01105
Plaintiff:
Felix D. Lujan
Defendant:
Colorado Dept. Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Roger Werholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkerson v. Colorado Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv01102
Defendant:
Colorado Dept of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Roger Werholtz and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Atkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eckley v. State of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2016cv00831
Plaintiff:
Todd Wesley Eckley
Defendant:
State of Colorado, The, John Hickenlooper and Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2016cv00829
Petitioner:
Alfonso Padilla
Respondent:
John Hickenlooper, Cynthia H. Coffman, Melissa Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzalez v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2016cv00830
Petitioner:
Jonathan R. Gonzalez
Respondent:
John Hickenlooper, Cynthia H. Coffman, Melissa Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
