Cases 31 - 40 of 61
HAMATI et al v. REVERE DATA, INC. et al
as 3:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
GHEIS HENRI HAMATI and SAMAR HAMATI
Defendant:
REVERE DATA, INC., ENGMANN OPTIONS, INC. and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LEVIS v. LANGLEY et al
as 1:2013cv06847
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEVIS
Defendant:
DAVID J. LANGLEY , JAC MEDI TRANDPORT , ABC, INC. (1-5) and others
Cross_claimant:
JAC MEDI TRANDPORT and DAVID J. LANGLEY
Cross_defendant:
ABC, INC. (1-5) and JOHN AND JANE DOES (1-5)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DINH v. LUU et al
as 3:2013cv04186
Plaintiff:
NANCY N. DINH
Defendant:
KHIEM T. LUU, MINH M. TO, ABC, INC. (1-5) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
READ v. WAL-MART CORP et al
as 2:2013cv00776
Plaintiff:
MIGUELINA READ
Defendant:
WAL-MART CORP , JOHN DOE CORPS 1-5 and JOHN AND JANE DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv07288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
TAIT v. 56TH STREET RENTALS, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv04019
Plaintiff:
SUSAN TAIT
Defendant:
56TH STREET RENTALS, LLC , ABC, INC. (1-5) and JOHN AND JANE DOES (1-5)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
