Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Sailem v. Oliver et al
as 4:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Steven T. Sailem
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Warden Shawn Emmons, Deputy Warden Joshua Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Davenport
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Nicholas Stewart and Steven Kendrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Emmons et al
as 4:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Bennett
Defendant:
Shawn Emmons, Joshua Jones and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Emmons et al
as 4:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Bennett
Defendant:
Warden Shawn Emmons, Joshua Jones and Jeffery Balled
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Emmonds et al
as 4:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
Brandon A. Davis
Defendant:
Warden Emmonds, Deputy Warden Ck Mrs Hammock/Evans and Dep Ward of Security Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Ward et al
as 4:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Dexter Shaw
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Robert Toole, Cedric Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Emmons et al
as 4:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Kendall Thomas
Defendant:
Shawn Emmons, Joshua Jones, Mr. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutherford v. Ward et al
as 4:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Barry L. Rutherford
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Joshua Jones, Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Ga. Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Chadrus LeQuarDra Brown
Defendant:
Ga. Dept of Corrections, State of Georgia, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Byron Terrell Arnold
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, McGee and Sword
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
