Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Lachut v. Carbonite, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03488
Defendant:
Linda Connly, Carbonite, Inc., Todd Krasnow and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Lachut
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03267
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Thompson v. People of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2019cv02468
Plaintiff:
Sanza Eugene Thompson
Defendant:
Sokal, People of Colorado, The and Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julien v. Kane et al
as 1:2018cv02852
Plaintiff:
Dywand Daytron Julien
Defendant:
No Named Defendants, Davis Talley, Robert Werthwein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Matevousian et al
as 1:2018cv02517
Defendant:
Thomas Kane, Jeff Sessions and Andre Matevousian
Plaintiff:
Richard Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice et al v. McIrvin et al
as 1:2018cv01190
Plaintiff:
Micheal Moody, Sherri Igou, Amanda Przymus and others
Defendant:
Chemguard, Kidde Fire Fighting, INC, The 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Tiwari et al v. U.S. Post Office et al
as 1:2018cv00745
Plaintiff:
Bhavani Tiwari, Raani A. Tiwari and Kane N. Sullivan
Defendant:
U.S. Post Office, Denver Post Office, Aurora MPO CL2 P.O and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Julien v. El Paso County Fourth Judicial District et al
as 1:2018cv00716
Petitioner:
Dywand Daytron Julien
Respondent:
El Paso County Fourth Judicial District, Thomas K. Kane, Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo - CMHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ford v. Kane et al
as 1:2018cv00441
Plaintiff:
Frank Ford
Defendant:
Marden Kane and Nabisco Oreo Cookies Sweepstakes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stine v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2017cv01961
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Office of Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
