Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Gonzales v. Raemish et al
as 1:2019cv03422
Defendant:
Francis Collier, Eric Renicker, Christine (I) A. Olson and others
Plaintiff:
Aliya (I) Gonzales and Aliya Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Winegardner et al
as 1:2019cv02971
Defendant:
Fagerstedt, Holland, Caley and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Borne et al
as 1:2019cv01525
Defendant:
Schaal, Prickett, Rivers and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv01290
Defendant:
Moore, Unknown Correctional Officers, Colorado Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Smith et al
as 1:2016cv03177
Plaintiff:
Keith W. Harmon
Defendant:
J. Smith, P.J. Havic, Richard Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dang v. Colorado Health Partners et al
as 1:2016cv01231
Plaintiff:
Phuong Van Dang
Defendant:
Colorado Health Partners, Richard E. Hodge and Kathleen Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Swibas et al
as 1:2014cv02258
Plaintiff:
Shane Johnson
Defendant:
Carie (I) Swibas, Carie Swibas, Jo Ann (I) Burt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denison v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv01584
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Nechol Denison
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Correctional Health Partners, Jill Lampela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodstock v. Bergondo et al
as 1:2013cv01146
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Woodstock
Defendant:
Mike Bergondo, Carol Brown, Paul Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dash et al
as 1:2012cv02400
Plaintiff:
Shane Johnson
Defendant:
Justin Dash, Justin (I) Dash, Donna Zavislan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
