Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Anghel v. Sebelius
as 2:2010cv04574
Plaintiff:
Maria-Lucia Anghel
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv06356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Benedictine Hospital v. Sebelius et al
as 1:2010cv00868
Plaintiff:
Benedictine Hospital
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius and National Government Services Blue Cross/Blue Shield Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Kettenmann v. Sebelius
as 1:2010cv05037
Plaintiff:
Joan M. Kettenmann
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ruggiero v. Obama et al
as 9:2010cv00542
Petitioner:
Christopher Ruggiero
Respondent:
Barack Hussein Obama, Eric H. Holder, Channing D. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Place for Achieving Total Health v. Sebelius
as 1:2010cv03776
Plaintiff:
Place for Achieving Total Health
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Fox Insurance Company v. Sebelius et al
as 1:2010cv02218
Plaintiff:
Fox Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Charlene Frizzera, Jaye Weisman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Berman v. Sebelius
as 1:2009cv10501
Plaintiff:
Sonia Berman
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Kingston Hospital v. Sebelius et al
as 1:2009cv01303
Plaintiff:
Kingston Hospital and Kingston Hospital
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius and National Government Services Blue Cross / Blue Shield Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
