Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Brown v. Orlando Police Dept. et al
as 6:2015cv02185
Plaintiff: Kirsha Brown
Defendant: Orlando Police Dept. and City of Orlando Mayor's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv01350
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brown v. Pro Mag Energy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2014cv01162
Plaintiff: Kirsha Brown
Defendant: Pro Mag Energy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kirsha Brown v. City of Miami, et al
as 13-12828
Plaintiff - Appellant: KIRSHA BROWN, d.b.a. Advocate, Targeted Individuals United
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF MIAMI, MAYOR'S OFFICE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND PERSONNEL
Brown v. The City of Miami et al
as 1:2013cv21477
Plaintiff: Kirsha Brown
Defendant: The City of Miami, Mayor's Office and United States Justice Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv20334
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kirsha Brown-Younger v. LULU.com, et al Featured Case
as 12-2791
Plaintiff - Appellant: KIRSHA BROWN-YOUNGER
Defendant - Appellee: LULU.COM, BARNES & NOBLE, APPLE COMPUTER, INCORPORATED, ITUNES and others
Kirsha Brown-Younger v. Chicago Police Department
as 12-2711
Plaintiff - Appellant: KIRSHA BROWN-YOUNGER
Defendant - Appellee: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Kirsha Brown-Younger v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 12-2629
Plaintiff - Appellant: KIRSHA BROWN-YOUNGER
Defendant - Appellee: LULU.COM, AMAZON.COM, INCORPORATED, BARNES & NOBLE and others
Brown-Younger et al v. LULU.Com et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01979
Defendant: ITUNES/APPLE, Barnes and Noble, IBOOKSTORE and others
Plaintiff: Kirsha Brown-Younger
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?