Cases 31 - 40 of 51
JONES v. GLOVER et al
as 1:2009cv03806
Petitioner:
RONALD JONES
Respondent:
LARRY GLOVER and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NUDGE v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2009cv03430
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN W. NUDGE
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, LARRY GLOVER and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRATSENIS v. GLOVER
as 2:2009cv03429
Petitioner:
GEORGE BRATSENIS
Respondent:
LARRY GLOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. GLOVER
as 3:2009cv02891
Petitioner:
RICKY MILLER
Respondent:
LARRY GLOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
GLAZEWSKI v. UNITED MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY, etal
as 2:2009cv02828
Plaintiff:
VINCENT W. GLAZEWSKI
Defendant:
UNITED MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY, THREE UNKNOWN DOCTORS, UNKNOWN NURSES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VASQUEZ v. GLOVER et al
as 2:2009cv02593
Petitioner:
GEORGE VASQUEZ
Respondent:
LARRY GLOVER and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUSH v. HAYMAN et al
as 2:2009cv02536
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RUSH
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, LARRY GLOVER, LEONARD W. RANDOLPH, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IANNACONE v. GLOVER et al
as 2:2009cv02179
Petitioner:
GABRIELLE IANNACONE
Respondent:
LARRY GLOVER and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TUTU v. GLOVER et al
as 2:2009cv02183
Petitioner:
CHUKWUEMEKA TUTU
Respondent:
LARRY GLOVER and ANN MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JENKINS v. GLOVER et al
as 2:2009cv02145
Plaintiff:
ALONZO JENKINS
Defendant:
LARRY GLOVER, BRUCE W. SAPP, CHARLES MCGRADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
