Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Steele v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2013cv00079
Petitioner:
Earl Wayne Steele
Respondent:
State of Idaho and Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stearns v. Wengler et al
as 1:2013cv00019
Petitioner:
Stacy Warren Stearns
Respondent:
Tim Wengler, Idaho Board of Correction and Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wolf et al v. Otter et al
as 1:2012cv00526
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf, R Hans Kruger and David S Begley
Defendant:
C.L. Butch Otter, Lawrence Wasden, Idaho State Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loftis v. Wengler et al
as 1:2012cv00379
Petitioner:
Kirk Andrew Loftis
Respondent:
Tim Wengler and Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newcomb Taysom v. Blad et al
as 4:2012cv00298
Plaintiff:
Nicola Jo Newcomb Taysom
Defendant:
Brian Blad, Gary Moore, Roger Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ogburn v. Wengler et al
as 1:2012cv00290
Petitioner:
Keith Alan Ogburn
Respondent:
Tim Wengler and Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abbott et al v. Wasden et al
as 1:2012cv00044
Plaintiff:
Dennis E Abbott, Louis Cunningham and Joseph Stanka
Defendant:
Lawrence Wasden, Jill Whittington, Idaho Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shepperd v. Wasden
as 1:2011cv00604
Petitioner:
Jason Allan Shepperd
Defendant:
Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Laird v. Smith et al
as 1:2011cv00541
Plaintiff:
Anthony Laird
Defendant:
Johanna Smith, Brent Reinke, Lawrence Wasden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
State of Idaho and Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
