Cases 31 - 40 of 257
Correa v. Gold Bull Vend, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv07781
Plaintiff:
Sandra Correa
Defendant:
GOLD BULL VEND, LLC (DBA AS SUDSY WATER LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANERS), LeChana Clark and Gold Bull Vend, LLC doing business as Sudsy Water Laundry & Dry Cleaners
Guaman v. Gold Coin II Laundry Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv03392
Plaintiff:
Dilma Guaman
Defendant:
Mildred Giraldo and Gold Coin II Laundry Corp.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01974
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Pablo et al v. John Doe Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv01664
Plaintiff:
Salomon Pablo
Defendant:
Eddy Chin Jr., Heidy Doe, Christopher Chin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00990
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hild v. ADLS Ventures 1 LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Defendant:
Laundry Associates LLC, ADLS Ventures 2 LLC, ADLS Ventures 1 LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hild
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Mancilla et al v. All American Laundry Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10255
Defendant:
All American Laundry Service, Inc. and Michael J. Martin
Plaintiff:
Alma Mancilla and Liz Maria Garcia Flores
Rodriguez v. Woodchuck Hollow Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05869
Defendant:
Woodchuck Hollow Management, Inc. d/b/a East End Laundry, Andrew Scott Donnelly and Woodchuck Hollow Management, Inc. doing business as East End Laundry
Plaintiff:
Susan Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Aviles et al v. Chelsea Laundry Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv08992
Plaintiff:
Fausta Aviles
Defendant:
Marco Doe, Chelsea Laundry Inc. d/b/a Chelsea Laundry, Susie Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
