Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Rogers v. DeCesaro et al
as 1:2016cv02733
Plaintiff:
Bionca Charmaine Rogers
Defendant:
A. Anthony DeCesaro, Michelle Brothers, Terry Jaques and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paulsen v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2016cv00129
Plaintiff:
Mark Walter Paulsen
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Dave Booth, Garett Gebhardt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huddleston v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2015cv02537
Plaintiff:
Dale Justin Huddleston
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Andrew Martinez, Andrew (I) Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 14-1462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, in his individual capacity, BILL RITTER, JR., in his individual capacity, TOM CLEMENTS, in his individual and official capacities and others
Gibson v. Campbell, et al
as 14-1386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WELLMAN E. GIBSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANNA MARIE CAMPBELL, C. HOLST, AIC, SHIRLEY STEINBECK and others
Robledo-Valdez v. West, et al
as 14-1200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG ROBLEDO-VALDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JEWEL WEST, TRAVIS TRANI, DALE BURKE and others
Walker v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2014cv01062
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Walker
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Aristedes W. Zavaras, Tony Carochi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robledo-Valdez v. West et al
as 1:2014cv00818
Plaintiff:
Craig Robledo-Valdez
Defendant:
Jewel West, Travis Trani, Susan Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robledo v. West, et al
as 14-1067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG S. ROBLEDO
Defendant - Appellee:
JEWEL WEST, DALE BURKE, CHRIS BARR and others
Carrillo Franco v. CDOC Executive Director et al
as 1:2013cv03016
Plaintiff:
Noe Carrillo Franco
Defendant:
CDOC Executive Director, Ken Stolba, Michael Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
