Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Ross Shade, et al v. Ronald George, et al
as 09-16346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSS S. SHADE and ESTATE OF MARY C. SHADE
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD M. GEORGE, Judge, WILLIAM C. VICKERY, in his capacity as Administrative Director of Courts, MARY M. ROBERTS and others
Francis Fahy v. The Supreme Court of Californi, et al
as 08-17496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS T. FAHY
Defendant - Appellee:
THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, RONALD M. GEORGE, Judge, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of California, CARLOS R. MORENO, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of California and others
Shade et al v. Judicial Counsel of the State of California et al
as 3:2008cv02563
Plaintiff:
Ross S. Shade and Mary C. Shade
Defendant:
Judicial Counsel of the State of California, Ronald M. George, Marvin R. Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shade et al v. Judicial Counsel of the State of California et al
as 4:2008cv02563
Plaintiff:
Ross S. Shade and Mary C. Shade
Defendant:
Judicial Counsel of the State of California, Ronald M. George, Marvin R. Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fahy v. George et al
as 4:2008cv02496
Plaintiff:
Francis Thomas Fahy
Defendant:
Ronald M. George, Carlos R. Moreno, Joyce L. Kennard and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Levi, et al v. George, et al
as 08-15242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIMON LEVI
Defendant:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, JUDY JOHNSON, DEBRA LAWSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD M. GEORGE, Judge, Chief Justice, CARLOS R. MORENO, JOYCE L. LENNARD and others
Paciulan, et al v. George, et al
as 3:1998cv01201
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Paciulan , William A. Kruse and Tanesha Walls Blye
Defendant:
Ronald M. George , Stanley Mosk, Joyce L. Kennard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
