Cases 31 - 40 of 74
MCKENNA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv04797
Plaintiff:
JAMES MCKENNA
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JESSE O'SHEA, JOE DOE NUMBER 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITEHEAD v. JONES et al
as 2:2012cv03662
Plaintiff:
RONELL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
DEMOSS JONES, L. PAPARO, BROCKWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MYERS v. JONES et al
as 2:2012cv03660
Plaintiff:
VALERIE MYERS
Defendant:
DEMOSS JONES, L. PAPARO, BROCKWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHANG v. COUNTY OF DELAWARE, OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 2:2012cv02936
Plaintiff:
SUK CHUL CHANG
Defendant:
COUNTY OF DELAWARE, OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY , KATAYOUN COPELAND , SHARON MCKENNA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PURICELLI v. CARNATION et al
as 2:2012cv00764
Plaintiff:
BRIAN PURICELLI
Defendant:
RAYMOND CARNATION, WILLIAM MCKENNA, CYNTHIA PALAMONE-MCKENNA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
BRANCH v. NICHOLAS et al
as 2:2012cv00355
Plaintiff:
STUART BRANCH
Defendant:
BERNADETTE NICHOLAS, KATHERINE NICHOLAS, RICHARD BRENNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCKENNA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv07092
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM K. MCKENNA
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SHELLEY R. SMITH, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKENNA v. MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv68101
Plaintiff:
HARRY A. MCKENNA
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MCKENNA v. AMERICAN EXPORT LINES INC.
as 5:2011cv54069
Plaintiff:
HARRY A. MCKENNA
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPORT LINES INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MCKENNA v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54812
Plaintiff:
HARRY A. MCKENNA
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
