Cases 31 - 40 of 252
Williams v. Haubstein et al
as 5:2022cv03008
Plaintiff:
Trayon Leval Williams
Defendant:
Brooke Haubstein, Sierra Oliver, Joseph Butcher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Anderson v. Tuxhorn et al
as 5:2022cv03018
Plaintiff:
Tommy Leroy Anderson
Defendant:
E. Tuxhorn, D. Robison, Leu Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Miller v. Aramark et al
as 5:2021cv03282
Plaintiff:
DeVonta B. Miller
Defendant:
Aramark and Shawnee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bowers v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv03224
Plaintiff:
Faheem L. Bowers
Defendant:
Samuel Rogers, (fnu) Roemich, (fnu) Spellman and others
Petitioner:
Donzell A. Jones, Antonio B. Flemming and Emmanuel J. Sanders
Interested Party:
CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2021cv03213
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flemming v. CoreCivic et al
as 5:2021cv03189
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bartzinie Flemming
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Brenda Miller and (fnu) Delaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2021cv02422
Plaintiff:
Donald M Miller and Donald M. Miller
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
Social Security Regional Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
