Cases 31 - 40 of 510
Moore v. Inch et al
as 6:2022cv00425
Petitioner:
David Lee Moore
Respondent:
Mark Inch, Lane, John Dow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardin v. Cruz et al
as 3:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hardin
Defendant:
Dr. Cruz, Ricky Dixon, Mark Inch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Inch, et al.
as 3:2022cv00113
Petitioner:
Lemuel L. Cole
Respondent:
Mark Inch and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
COOPER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL LEANDER COOPER
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, J K BUTLER, M SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laycock v. Inch et al
as 1:2022cv20331
Plaintiff:
James B. Laycock
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Correctional Officer Gibbs, Correctional Officer Aguilar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Inch et al
as 6:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Edwards
Defendant:
Mark Inch, W. Bowden and T. Svendsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DESANTIS et al
as 5:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
TYRONE L SMITH
Respondent:
RON DESANTIS and MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POWELL v. DESANTIS et al
as 3:2022cv00594
Petitioner:
EDDIE POWELL
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, MARK INCH, GEO PRIVATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVELACE v. INCH et al
as 3:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
LAZAVIER L LOVELACE
Defendant:
MARK INCH, HEAR, BOOTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
