Cases 31 - 40 of 182
GHAHARY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Federal Transfer Center, United States Bureau of Prisons, JOHN DOE, 2 and others
Plaintiff:
DARIUS A GHAHARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Jackson et al
as 4:2020cv00424
Defendant:
David B Lee, Michael L Herrington, Leroy Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney et al v. Community Health Systems Inc et al
as 5:2020cv00365
Defendant:
Community Health Systems Inc, Durant HMA LLC, Marshall County HMA LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Sinkfield v. Grady County Law Enforcement Center et al
as 5:2019cv00597
Plaintiff:
Maurice J Sinkfield
Defendant:
Grady County Law Enforcement Center, United States Marshal Service and E Forsythe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holz v. United States Marshal Service
as 5:2019cv00483
Petitioner:
Timothy Edward Holz
Respondent:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Casper et al v. Liberty Property Associates L.L.C.
as 4:2019cv00256
Plaintiff:
Carl Lindesmith, Holly Sandoval, Marie Kay Freeman and others
Defendant:
Liberty Property Associates L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Love v. Jacobson, et. al.
as 5:2019cv00259
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Love
Interested Party:
United States of America
Matousek v. Waukomis City of et al
as 5:2019cv00151
Defendant:
Waukomis City of, Marshall Woodson and Reid Gaines
Plaintiff:
Terri Matousek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowman v. Marshall Square LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00085
Defendant:
BBL Builders LP, Gardner Tanenbaum Group LLC and Marshall Square LLC
Plaintiff:
Dana Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
