Cases 31 - 40 of 45
SMITH v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv05788
Plaintiff:
MARIE SMITH
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. USA
as 4:2011cv01272
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sara Marie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SMITH et al v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv62073
Plaintiff:
GUS SMITH and LETHA MARIE SMITH
Defendant:
AC&S, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 2:2010cv81564
Plaintiff:
CHARLES T. SMITH and VILMA MARIE SMITH
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO. , AMERICAN ASBESTOS CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCBURNETT, et al v. AC AND S, INC.(ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), et al
as 2:2010cv63516
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA J. MCBURNETT , J.C. MCBURNETT , CAROLYN COUNTS and others
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv89414
Plaintiff:
MARIE SMITH and JERRY P. SMITH
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SMITH et al v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
as 2:2009cv86946
Plaintiff:
MARIE SMITH
Defendant:
U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SMITH
as 1:2009cv00087
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AUDREY MARIE SMITH
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
SMITH v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO.
as 2:2008cv69371
Plaintiff:
MARY SMITH
Defendant:
MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SMITH v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 2:2008cv68103
Plaintiff:
MARY SMITH
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
