Cases 31 - 40 of 65
McLean v. City Of Alexandria
as 1:2014cv01398
Plaintiff:
Scott McLean
Defendant:
City Of Alexandria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shin v. Max Cleaners, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00962
Plaintiff:
Miae Shin
Defendant:
Max Cleaners, Inc., McLean Super Cleaners, Ballston Mall Tailoring, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Palaxar Group, LLC et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2013cv00641
Petitioner:
Frank L. Amodeo
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Aaron Carter Bates, The Maher Law Firm, PA, Eric Langley and others
Plaintiff:
Palaxar Group, LLC and Palaxar Holdings, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zongolowicz v. Salem Leasing Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv00053
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Zongolowicz
Defendant:
Salem Leasing Corporation and Patrick McLean Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
McLean Youth Athletics et al v. United States Department of Interior National Park Service
as 1:2013cv01257
Plaintiff:
McLean Youth Athletics and McLean Youth Lacrosse
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior National Park Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Mclean v. Ponton
as 2:2013cv00409
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Mclean
Respondent:
Henry Ponton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McLean v. Kiser et al
as 7:2012cv00495
Defendant:
Mr. Brock, Mr. Diets, Mr. Kiser and others
Plaintiff:
Quentin McLean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLean v. USA
as 1:2012cv01145
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alfreda Christine McLean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McLean v. Pease et al
as 7:2012cv00432
Plaintiff:
Quentin McLean
Defendant:
Ms. Mullins and Ms. Pease
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLean v. Ratliff et al
as 7:2012cv00227
Defendant:
Mr. Adams, Mr. Brown, Mr. Kiser and others
Plaintiff:
Quentin McLean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
