Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Rayvon Boatman v. Donald Sawyer, et al
as 21-10747
Defendant / Appellee:
MELINDA MASTERS, Assistant to Clinical Director (FCCC), EMILY SALEMA, Director of Mental Health (FCCC), KERI FITZPATRICK, Employee/Library Staff/Recreation Therapist and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYVON BOATMAN, a.k.a. Lavon Lee Boatman
Boatman v. Porfert et al
as 2:2021cv00168
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Wellpath Recovery Solutions, Jon P. Carner and others
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boatman v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2021cv00061
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman and Lavon Lee Boatman
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, D. Riddle, Melinda Masters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vega v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2020cv00684
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Melinda Masters, Robert Velez and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Francisco Vega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boatman v. Ute et al
as 2:2020cv00494
Defendant:
Sarah Senter, Jane Doe Morris, Rebecca Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vega v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2020cv00406
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Melinda Masters, Robert Velez and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Francisco Vega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boatman v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2020cv00339
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, John Coner, Wellpath and others
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houtsma v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2019cv00762
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, DCF, Melinda Masters and others
Plaintiff:
John Houtsma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bramlett v. Masters et al
as 2:2019cv00712
Defendant:
Melinda Masters, Donald Sawyer, Emily Salema and others
Plaintiff:
William Edward Bramlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bramlett v. Masters et al
as 8:2019cv02396
Petitioner:
William Edward Bramlett
Respondent:
Donald Sawyer, Florida Department of Children and Families, Emily Salema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
