Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Schwendeman v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv27171
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Schwendeman
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Custer v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv26852
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Custer
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeffers v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv26447
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Jeffers
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv24927
Plaintiff:
Laurie D. Mathis and Michael D. Mathis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Post et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv24801
Plaintiff:
Celia R. Post and Michael D. Post
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scovel et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv18134
Plaintiff:
Glynda A. Scovel and Michael D. Scovel
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kavanagh et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv14447
Plaintiff:
Lynn A. Kavanagh and Michael D. Kavanagh
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv13860
Plaintiff:
Shonnie Smith and Michael D. Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sullivan et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10083
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Lee Sullivan and Michael D. Sullivan
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kuczma et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv07621
Plaintiff:
Vita Kuczma and Michael D. Kuczma
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
