Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Moffett v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv23105
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Bernard Moffett
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons , Warden , Everglades Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
AMBROSINO et al v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM INC
as 5:2012cv00033
Plaintiff:
NOEMI AMBROSINO , DOUGLAS KYLE MOFFETT , AMBRO'S GULF COAST INC and others
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Leedom Financial Services, LLC et al v. Partners Lending Auto Group, LLC et al
as 8:2010cv00727
Plaintiff:
Leedom Financial Services, LLC and Leedom and Associates, LLC
Defendant:
Partners Lending Auto Group, LLC , Palm Beach Links Capital, L.P., Richard Epley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Moffett v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv20756
Plaintiff:
William F Moffett
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation , GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, LLC , Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moffett v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2008cv02574
Petitioner:
Marshall Moffett
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moffett v. Harrison et al
as 8:2008cv00253
Petitioner:
Marshall Moffett
Respondent:
Duffie Harrison, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOFFETT v. HARRISON et al
as 4:2007cv00191
Petitioner:
MARSHALL MOFFETT
Respondent:
DUFFIE HARRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
