Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MEMO MONEY ORDER COMPANY, INC. v. SIDAMON-ERISTOFF et al
as 3:2010cv05460
Plaintiff:
MEMO MONEY ORDER COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
ANDREW P. SIDAMON-ERISTOFF, STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and STEVEN R. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NANSON v. GE MONEY BANK, F.S.B.
as 3:2010cv05363
Plaintiff:
LESLIE ANN NANSON
Defendant:
GE MONEY BANK, F.S.B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
BUTLER v. NYSA-ILA MCNEY PURCHASE PENSION FUND AND PLAN et al
as 2:2010cv04998
Plaintiff:
BILLY E. BUTLER
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES , CHARLES WARD , XYZ CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP v. MONEY WAREHOUSE, INC. et al
as 3:2009cv02087
Plaintiff:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
MONEY WAREHOUSE, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. YOUR MONEY MATTERS, INC.
as 2:2009cv01080
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
YOUR MONEY MATTERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
RAIGOSA et al v. NRPM HOME IMPROVEMENTS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00938
Plaintiff:
CARLOS RAIGOSA and MONICA RAIGOSA
Defendant:
NRPM HOME IMPROVEMENTS, INC. and GE MONEY BANK
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. UNITED CREDIT ADJUSTERS, INC. et al
as 3:2009cv00798
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED CREDIT ADJUSTERS, INC., UNITED CREDIT ADJUSTORS, INC., UNITED COUNSELING ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
