Cases 31 - 40 of 82
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company v. All-Ways Forwarding Int'l Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10344
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
All-Ways Forwarding Int'l Inc., All-Ways Logistics Int'l (Asia Pacific) LLC, RS Logistics Limited and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Jessica Ship Holding S.A., NYK Shipmanagement Pte Ltd, Ocean Network Express, Pte. Ltd. a/k/a ONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad Admiralty
Backer EHP Inc. et al v. M/V One Apus et al
as 1:2022cv06461
Plaintiff:
Backer EHP Inc. and HDI Global Insurance Company
Defendant:
M/V ONE Apus, Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd., Hapag-Lloyd Aktiengesellschaft and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1701 Violation of Shipping Act of 1984 (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA v. DYNAMIC WORLDWIDE LOGISTICS, INC.
as 1:2022cv06370
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America and H&T SEAFOOD, INC.
Defendant:
Dynamic Worldwide Logistics, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
M/V ONE Apus, CHIDORI SHIP HOLDING LLC, JESSICA SHIP HOLDINGS S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741 Shipping (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Union Insurance Company, Ltd. et al v. M/V One Apus et al
as 1:2022cv03836
Plaintiff:
Union Insurance Company, Ltd., Taian Insurance Company, Ltd., The First Insurance Company, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
M/V ONE Apus, Soonest Express, Inc., Soonest Express (HK) Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad Admiralty
ACE American Insurance Company et al v. America Pacific Container Line, Inc et al
as 1:2022cv05302
Plaintiff:
Ace American Insurance Company and Federal Insurance Company
Defendant:
America Pacific Container Line, Inc., Vantec HTS Forwarding, Ltd, UPS Asia Group Pte. Ltd. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation, Yang Ming (America) Corporation, Ocean Network Express Pte., Ltd. ONE and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Expeditors International Ocean Inc et al
as 1:2022cv05233
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Expeditors International Ocean Inc. and Expeditors International of Washington Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
OCEAN NETWORK EXPRESS PTE LTD
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1300 F.E.L.A. (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Navigators Management Company Inc v. Expeditors International of Washington Inc
as 1:2022cv05235
Plaintiff:
Navigators Management Company Inc.
Defendant:
Expeditors International of Washington Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
OCEAN NETWORK EXPRESS PTE LTD
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1300 F.E.L.A. (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
AIT WORLDWIDE LOGISTICS, INC. et al v. M/V ONE APUS in rem et al
as 1:2022cv05220
Defendant:
HMM Co Ltd., M/V One Apus in rem, OCEAN NETWORK EXPRESS PTE LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Ait Worldwide Logistics Inc., Topocean Consolidation Service (Los Angeles) Inc. and Worldbridge Logistics, Inc.
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company et al v. Apex Logistics International Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv08974
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, Federal Insurance Company, Indemnity Insurance Company of North America and others
Defendant:
Apex Logistics International Inc., UPS Asia Group Pte. Ltd., Topocean Consolidation Service (Los Angeles) Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation, Yang Ming (America) Corporation, Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd. (ONE) and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
C.H. ROBINSON INTERNATIONAL INC. v. M/V ONE APUS et al
as 1:2022cv05221
Plaintiff:
C.H. Robinson International Inc. doing business as Christal Lines
Defendant:
M/V ONE Apus, CHIDORI SHIP HOLDING LLC, JESSICA SHIP HOLDINGS S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
