Cases 31 - 40 of 52
In Re: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin
as 2:2010mc00056
Petitioner:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent:
William C. Martin
Cause Of Action: Disbarment Proceedings
In Re: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Barton
as 2:2010mc00042
Petitioner:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent:
Jeffrey L. Barton
Cause Of Action: Disbarment Proceedings
In Re: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mason
as 2:2010mc00032
Petitioner:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent:
Scott Palmer Mason
Cause Of Action: Disbarment Proceedings
In Re: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hanson
as 2:2009mc00185
Petitioner:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent:
Robert Kevin Hanson
Cause Of Action: Disbarment Proceedings
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown
as 2:2009mc00112
Plaintiff:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Defendant:
Raymond David Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Disbarment Proceedings
Court:
Fourth Circuit
›
West Virginia
›
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Type:
Other Statutes
In Re: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Dues
as 2:2009mc00098
Respondent:
Theodore R. Dues, Jr.
Petitioner:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Cause Of Action: Disbarment Proceedings
In Re: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Davis
as 2:2009mc00084
Petitioner:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent:
Christopher A. Davis
Cause Of Action: Disbarment Proceedings
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Toler
as 2:2009mc00055
Plaintiff:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent:
Jessica Leigh Toler
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Court:
Fourth Circuit
›
West Virginia
›
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Type:
Other Statutes
In Re: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mooney
as 2:2009mc00035
Petitioner:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent:
Joan A. Mooney
In Re: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Carrick
as 2:2009mc00022
Petitioner:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent:
C. Patrick Carrick
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
