Cases 31 - 40 of 240
Shook v. County of Hawaii Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Reed Shook
Defendant:
County of Hawaii Police Department, Chief Paul Ferreira and Jason Grouns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fukuda v. Chang et al
as 1:2022cv00015
Defendant:
Sonia Nakada, Justice Gary W. B. Chang, Former Justice Patrick Border and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Fukuda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Morehouse et al v. County of Hawaii et al
as 1:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Bradley Morehouse, Vienna Morehouse and Infant Son
Defendant:
County of Hawaii, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Galera v. Servco Pacific/Chevrolet et al
as 1:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Paul Galera
Defendant:
Servco Pacific/Chevrolet, HMSA, Queen's Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolentino v. Saito
as 1:2021cv00429
Plaintiff:
Arthur B. Tolentino, Rick V. Paulino and Jeanine Lum
Defendant:
Paul Saito, Glenn Saito, Sam Fujikawa and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Hueter et al v. AST Telecomm LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00377
Plaintiff:
Steven Jay Pincus Hueter, Faamuli Pete Faamuli and Michael S. Kirk
Defendant:
AST Telecomm LLC d/b/a Bluesky Communications, Raj Deo, Paul Michael Young and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Galera v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Paul Galera
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Clervrain v. Laxalt
as 1:2021cv00274
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Adam Paul Laxalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clervrain v. Laxalt
as 1:2021cv00275
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Adam Paul Laxalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
