Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Perkins v. LeGrand et al
as 2:2014cv00434
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Respondent:
Robert LeGrand
Petitioner:
Billy Wayne Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ochoa v. Esquiver et al
as 3:2013cv00499
Defendant:
C. Coulston, D. Esquiver, R. Healer and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Torres Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ochoa v. Esquiver et al
as 3:2013cv00500
Defendant:
A. Ashdown, D. Esquiver, R. Healer and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Torres Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ochoa v. Perkins et al
as 3:2013cv00498
Defendant:
A. Ashdown, R. Healer, D. Jacobs and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Torres Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ochoa v. Perkins et al
as 3:2013cv00450
Defendant:
A. Ashdown, M. Blanco, C. Cooke and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Torres Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ochoa v. Baker et al
as 3:2013cv00449
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Britton, Raul Godinez and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Torres Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ochoa v. Healer et al
as 3:2013cv00419
Defendant:
R. Buurma, V. Crowder, R. Healer and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Torres Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ochoa v. Baker et al
as 3:2013cv00417
Defendant:
Renee Baker, R. Godines, P. Leavitt and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Torres Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ochoa v. Perkins et al
as 3:2013cv00353
Defendant:
A. Ashdown, D. Brown, A. Carlines and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Torres Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
