Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Weimer v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2016cv00179
Plaintiff:
Shane C Weimer
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Ada County Public Defenders Office, Ada County Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arledge v. Ada County et al
as 1:2015cv00590
Plaintiff:
Douglas Ray Arledge
Defendant:
Ada County, Ada County Public Defenders Office, Ada County Prosecutors Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Born v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2015cv00551
Plaintiff:
Clinton P Born, II
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Ada County, Daniel Steckel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hulse v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2015cv00287
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel J Hulse
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Ada County and Ada County Prosecutor's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macik v. First Judicial District Court of Idaho et al
as 1:2014cv00378
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Macik
Defendant:
First Judicial District Court of Idaho, Idaho Department of Corrections, Fourth Judicial District of Idaho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerdon v. 5th District Court et al
as 1:2013cv00342
Plaintiff:
James Alan Gerdon
Defendant:
5th District Court, Kristina Glasscock, Sharie Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Twist v. Canyon County et al
as 4:2012cv00156
Petitioner:
Ramona Twist
Respondent:
Canyon County, City of Caldwell, Canyon Prosecutors and others
Defendant:
Canyon Sherriffs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Twist v. Canyon County et al
as 1:2012cv00155
Plaintiff:
Ramona Twist
Defendant:
Canyon County, City of Caldwell, Canyon Prosecutors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Obiedo v. US Marshals Service et al
as 1:2012cv00129
Plaintiff:
Raul Obiedo
Defendant:
US Marshals Service, FBI, DEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
