Cases 31 - 40 of 123
Hubbard v. Minnesota Department of Corrections
as 0:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Eddie Nile Hubbard
Defendant:
Paul Schnell and Minnesota Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latimer v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Mark Latimer
Defendant:
Paul Schnell and William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Defendant:
Paul Schnell and Guy Bosch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yaritz v. Underwriter of Rush City/Moose Lake et al
as 0:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Harold Yaritz
Defendant:
Underwriter of Rush City/Moose Lake, Paul Schnell, Michelle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Xiong v. Schnell
as 0:2022cv03186
Petitioner:
Kong Meng Xiong
Respondent:
Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avila v. Schnell et al
as 0:2022cv03180
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Gutierrez Avila, Jr.
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Vicki Janssen, Jeanette Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odneal v. Schnell et al
as 0:2022cv03107
Plaintiff:
Shawn K. Odneal
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Guy Bosch, Marrisa Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Schnell et al
as 0:2022cv03074
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Defendant:
Paul Schnell and Guy Bosch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stahlmann v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2022cv03058
Plaintiff:
Edward David Stahlmann
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Centurion of Minnesota, Paul Schnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Simon et al
as 0:2022cv03034
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Defendant:
Steve Simon and Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
