Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Smith v. Quintol et al
as 2:2013cv05003
Defendant:
Thorn Hill, Miller, Forbes and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Strombres v. Sinclair et al
as 2:2012cv00598
Plaintiff:
Glenn A Stombres
Defendant:
Sinclair, Ron Knight, Ricewig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Board of Trustees of the Northwest Ironworkers Health and Security Fund v. Twin Erectors and Steel Fabricators, Inc. et al
as 2:2012mc00047
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Northwest Ironworkers Health and Security Fund
Defendant:
Twin Erectors and Steel Fabricators, Inc. and George Holland
Garnishee:
Pease and Sons, Inc.
Ellis v. Pease et al
as 2:2011cv05126
Plaintiff:
Jamal Ellis
Defendant:
C Pease, Mark A Kucza and R Jenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. McKenna et al
as 3:2011cv05629
Plaintiff:
Matthew G Silva
Defendant:
Rob McKenna, John S Blonien, Douglas Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hausken v. Moss et al
as 2:2011cv00211
Plaintiff:
Phillip B Hausken
Defendant:
Moss, Herriott and Charles Pease
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Estes-Sundberg et al
as 2:2011cv00108
Plaintiff:
Jerry Glenn Thompson
Defendant:
C Pease, C Bowman, Steve Sinclair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hausken v. Pease et al
as 2:2011cv05040
Plaintiff:
Phillip B Hausken
Defendant:
Charles Pease, Warneke, McGill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ogan v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv05016
Plaintiff:
Bill M Ogan
Defendant:
Pease, Washington State Penitentiary Medical Care Director, Shirly Niesner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Urquhart v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2010cv01598
Plaintiff:
Mary Urquhart
Defendant:
Colleen Armstrong, David Pease and Hunter's Run Equestrian Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
